Pittsburgh Clown Dejan Kovacevic thinks Bruins defense,goaltending isn’t better than Ottawa

We had no idea who Dejan Kovacevic is but apparently he writes for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review as a sports columnist  professional clown. He had a story talking about how the Pens stars couldn't score if they fell into a brothel with $100s sticking out of their assholes. But he found a way to diss the Bruins defense and  Tuukka Rask in one swoop:

Correct. Boston's defense is packing in tight around Rask. But come on, we aren't talking about a team that's any better or worse defensively than the Senators, and we certainly aren't talking about a goaltender the caliber of Ottawa's Craig Anderson.

That's right. You read that right. …we aren't talking about a team that's any better or worse defensively than the Senators and we certainly aren't talking about a goaltender the caliber of Ottawa's Craig Anderson were things this professional sports writer actually spewed on the Intnernet. We've seen better shit in Purrgeron's litterbox.

But yea, Chara is just like Erik Karlsson expect Karlsson couldn't defend one of those kids during 3-Minutes of Fame at the Garden, and Chara's shutting down the world's best forwards night and night out. Not even gonna bother with the rest of the Senator's defenders.

As for Tuukka Rask, his numbers are better than Timmy Thomas during the 2011 run and he's let in only two goals in past three games. They're also better than Craig Anderson and Anderson had a pretty solid year. So I guess he's right that Rask isn't the caliber of goaltender of Anderson… he's better.

Mr. Dejavu should worry more about the Pens' shitty goaltending instead of trying to make Rask look awful when his nubmers are anything but. He's not the only Pens media tool who thinks Rask is overrated. Some guy anmed Mark Madden said something similar. Can't remember the specifics but it's not worth going through his diarrhea to find it.  Just know he also said Rask sucked.

Mr. Digiorno isn't done, yet. He goes on:

Blame Bylsma's system if you want, but the system applied was no different than Game 1, and all concerned on both sides were adamant after Game 2 that Claude Julien didn't make any adjustments on the Boston end.

So the Bruins who had no answer for Bylsma's system in Game 1 suddenly solved it?

No answer to Bylsma's system in Game 1? The Bruins put up three goals and shut the Penguins down in Game 1. Then they put up another 6 goals and let in only one in Game 2. If that's not an answer to a system than I don't know what is.

And people bitch about Boston media. Pitt's no better. No wonder why the Penguins and some of their fans are acting like they're entitled to wins. Their media keeps blowing them and making excuses. Dejan Kervorkian is almost as bad as Stan Fischler.

Justin

About Justin

Co-Founder for multi-award winning @DaysofYOrr. I mix nerd fandom & sports. For my historical adventure novels visit www.JMAucoin.com.

Quantcast